<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Harness Design on CyberSecurity Elite</title><link>https://cybersecurityelite.com/tags/harness-design/</link><description>Recent content in Harness Design on CyberSecurity Elite</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 18:55:51 +0200</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://cybersecurityelite.com/tags/harness-design/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>GPN CTF 2026 — LLM Harness Post-Mortem: Where Claude Code Got It Right (and Wrong)</title><link>https://cybersecurityelite.com/ctf-writeups/gpn-ctf-2026-llm-harness-postmortem/</link><pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 19:58:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://cybersecurityelite.com/ctf-writeups/gpn-ctf-2026-llm-harness-postmortem/</guid><description>GPN CTF 2026 Meta: the Claude Code harness behind 19 writeups — sub-agent parallelism, scratch-dir caching, six wasted hours on the wrong NTRU framing, and the corrective rules I&amp;#39;d port to any future CTF.</description></item></channel></rss>